Daniel Conway | Military Attorney
  • Practice Areas
    • Correcting Military Records >
      • Evaluation Report Appeals
      • Reprimand Appeals
      • Family Advocacy Program Appeals
      • Discharge Review Boards
      • Cadet Misconduct
      • Titling Actions
      • Military Protective Orders
    • Separation Boards
    • Military Medical Malpractice Claims
    • Forms, Downloads, and Regulations
  • Military Crimes and Defenses
    • Military Law >
      • Court-martial Information >
        • Know Your Rights
        • Court-Martial Rules >
          • Pretrial Confinement
          • Unlawful Command Influence
          • Article 31 Violation
          • Military Rule of Evidence 412
          • Involuntary Statements
          • Failure to State an Offense
          • Wheeler Factors
      • Court-Martial Defense >
        • Military Sexual Assault Defense
        • Military Drug Defense >
          • Drug Detection Windows
          • Marijuana
          • Cocaine
          • Morphine and Heroin
        • Disrespect Offenses
        • Conspiracy Cases
        • False Statements >
          • Obstruction of Justice
        • Use of Force
        • Assault Cases
        • Conduct Unbecoming
      • Court-Martial Appeals >
        • Petitions for a New Trial
        • Insufficient Evidence
    • Introduction
    • Article 77 Principles
    • Article 78 Accessory After the Fact
    • Article 79 Lesser Included Offenses
    • Article 80 Conspiracy
    • Article 81 Attempts
    • Article 82 Solicitation
    • Article 85 Desertion
    • Article 86 AWOL
    • Article 88 Contempt Towards Officials
    • Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order
    • Article 93 Maltreatment
    • Article 107 False Official Statement
    • Article 112a Wrongful Use of a Controlled Substance
    • Article 119 Manslaughter
    • Article 119b Child Endangerment
    • Article 121 Larceny or Wrongful Appropriation
    • Article 125 Kidnapping
    • Article 133 Conduct Unbecoming
    • Article 134 Bribery and Graft
    • Article 134 Indecent Language
    • Article 134 Obstruction of Justice
  • Firm History
    • Films
    • Books
    • Sketches
    • My Lai
    • Abu Ghraib
    • Haditha
    • MARSOC
    • The Stryker 5
    • Gary Myers
  • Results
  • Blog

Chapter 49: Article 134, UCMJ BRIBERY AND GRAFT

§ 49:1
Elements

§ 49:2
Discussion

§ 49:3
Standard Instructions

§ 49:4
Maximum Punishments

§ 49:5
Lesser Included Offenses

§ 49:1 – Elements
 
Asking, accepting, or receiving
 
  1. That the accused wrongfully asked, accepted, or received a thing of value from a certain person or organization;

  2. That the accused then occupied a certain official position or had certain official duties; 

  3. That the accused asked, accepted, or received this thing of value ([bribery] with the intent to have the accused’s decision or action influenced with respect to a certain matter) ([graft] as compensation for or in recognition of services rendered, to be rendered, or both, by the accused in relation to a certain matter); 

  4. That this certain matter was an official matter in which the United States was and is interested; and

  5. That, under the circumstances, the conduct of the accused was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
 
Promising, offering, or giving
 
  1. That the accused wrongfully promised, offered, or gave a thing of value to a certain person;

  2. That this person then occupied a certain official position or had certain official duties;  

  3. That the this thing of value was promised, offered, or given  ([bribery] with the intent to have the accused’s decision or action influenced with respect to a certain matter) ([graft] as compensation for or in recognition of services rendered, to be rendered, or both, by the accused in relation to a certain matter); 

  4. That this certain matter was an official matter in which the United States was and is interested; and 

  5. That, under the circumstances, the conduct of the accused was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
 
 
§ 49:2 – Discussion

The fundamental differences between bribery and graft are that bribery requires intent to influence or be influenced regarding matters of which the United States has an interest.  Graft involves compensation for influence where no compensation is due.  In United States v. McCrimmon, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces clearly articulated the different types of intent and social interests in the offense:
 
“For the two separate bribery offenses of giving and receiving a bribe under [UCMJ] there are different corrupt intents. On the part of the briber, this requires an intent to subject the official action of the recipient to the influence of personal gain or advantage rather than public welfare. It does not require that the action sought to be induced should benefit the briber or should actually be detrimental to the public. The social interest demands that official action should be free from improper motives of personal advantage, and an intent to subject the action to such motives is a corrupt intent. If money is paid for such a purpose it is immaterial to the guilt of the briber whether the officer's official conduct was actually influenced or not. On the part of the bribee, an intent to use the opportunity to perform a public duty as a means of acquiring an unlawful personal benefit or advantage, is a corrupt intent.”[1]
 
Defense counsel should be ever conscious that Wharton’s Rule applies in bribery cases.  There is a temptation in the military for prosecutors to charge conspiracies whenever possible.  Bribery necessarily involves two or more individuals to effectuate the commission of the crime; therefore, there can be no conspiracy. 
 
§ 49:3 - Standard Instructions
Standard Instructions
DA Pamphlet 49-9
3-66-1: Bribery and graft – asking, accepting, or receiving.
3-66-2: Bribery and graft – promising, offering, or giving.
 
§ 49:4 - Maximum Punishment
 
The maximum punishment of bribery is a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for five years.  The maximum punishment for graft is the same, except the maximum confinement is three years. 
​
§ 49:5 – Lesser Included Offenses
 
The lesser-included offense of bribery is graft.  Article 80 – attempts is a lesser included offense of both crimes.


[1] United States v. McCrimmon, 60 M.J. 145, 150 (C.A.A.F. 2004).

Court Martial Defense
Sexual Crime Defense
Drug Crimes
Violent Crimes
Larceny & Financial Fraud
Desertion & Awol


Services
Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP)
UCMJ Investigations
GOMOR Rebuttals
Administrative Separations
Resources
Case Results
Videos
Testimonials
Blogs
Locations
United States
South Korea
Okinawa, Japan
Mainland Japan
Europe
Worldwide
CALL 833-934-UCMJ
Email
Resources
Free Initial Consultations
Confidential. In depth. Valuable.

833-934-8265 (UCMJ)
Picture
© COPYRIGHT 2019. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 
The information on this page is informational in nature. Nothing on this or associated pages should be construed as legal advice for a particular case. Likewise, the information on this website does not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
  • Practice Areas
    • Correcting Military Records >
      • Evaluation Report Appeals
      • Reprimand Appeals
      • Family Advocacy Program Appeals
      • Discharge Review Boards
      • Cadet Misconduct
      • Titling Actions
      • Military Protective Orders
    • Separation Boards
    • Military Medical Malpractice Claims
    • Forms, Downloads, and Regulations
  • Military Crimes and Defenses
    • Military Law >
      • Court-martial Information >
        • Know Your Rights
        • Court-Martial Rules >
          • Pretrial Confinement
          • Unlawful Command Influence
          • Article 31 Violation
          • Military Rule of Evidence 412
          • Involuntary Statements
          • Failure to State an Offense
          • Wheeler Factors
      • Court-Martial Defense >
        • Military Sexual Assault Defense
        • Military Drug Defense >
          • Drug Detection Windows
          • Marijuana
          • Cocaine
          • Morphine and Heroin
        • Disrespect Offenses
        • Conspiracy Cases
        • False Statements >
          • Obstruction of Justice
        • Use of Force
        • Assault Cases
        • Conduct Unbecoming
      • Court-Martial Appeals >
        • Petitions for a New Trial
        • Insufficient Evidence
    • Introduction
    • Article 77 Principles
    • Article 78 Accessory After the Fact
    • Article 79 Lesser Included Offenses
    • Article 80 Conspiracy
    • Article 81 Attempts
    • Article 82 Solicitation
    • Article 85 Desertion
    • Article 86 AWOL
    • Article 88 Contempt Towards Officials
    • Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order
    • Article 93 Maltreatment
    • Article 107 False Official Statement
    • Article 112a Wrongful Use of a Controlled Substance
    • Article 119 Manslaughter
    • Article 119b Child Endangerment
    • Article 121 Larceny or Wrongful Appropriation
    • Article 125 Kidnapping
    • Article 133 Conduct Unbecoming
    • Article 134 Bribery and Graft
    • Article 134 Indecent Language
    • Article 134 Obstruction of Justice
  • Firm History
    • Films
    • Books
    • Sketches
    • My Lai
    • Abu Ghraib
    • Haditha
    • MARSOC
    • The Stryker 5
    • Gary Myers
  • Results
  • Blog