Daniel Conway | Military Attorney
  • Practice Areas
    • Correcting Military Records >
      • Evaluation Report Appeals
      • Reprimand Appeals
      • Family Advocacy Program Appeals
      • Discharge Review Boards
      • Cadet Misconduct
      • Titling Actions
      • Military Protective Orders
    • Separation Boards
    • Military Medical Malpractice Claims
    • Forms, Downloads, and Regulations
  • Military Crimes and Defenses
    • Military Law >
      • Court-martial Information >
        • Know Your Rights
        • Court-Martial Rules >
          • Pretrial Confinement
          • Unlawful Command Influence
          • Article 31 Violation
          • Military Rule of Evidence 412
          • Involuntary Statements
          • Failure to State an Offense
          • Wheeler Factors
      • Court-Martial Defense >
        • Military Sexual Assault Defense
        • Military Drug Defense >
          • Drug Detection Windows
          • Marijuana
          • Cocaine
          • Morphine and Heroin
        • Disrespect Offenses
        • Conspiracy Cases
        • False Statements >
          • Obstruction of Justice
        • Use of Force
        • Assault Cases
        • Conduct Unbecoming
      • Court-Martial Appeals >
        • Petitions for a New Trial
        • Insufficient Evidence
    • Introduction
    • Article 77 Principles
    • Article 78 Accessory After the Fact
    • Article 79 Lesser Included Offenses
    • Article 80 Conspiracy
    • Article 81 Attempts
    • Article 82 Solicitation
    • Article 85 Desertion
    • Article 86 AWOL
    • Article 88 Contempt Towards Officials
    • Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order
    • Article 93 Maltreatment
    • Article 107 False Official Statement
    • Article 112a Wrongful Use of a Controlled Substance
    • Article 119 Manslaughter
    • Article 119b Child Endangerment
    • Article 121 Larceny or Wrongful Appropriation
    • Article 125 Kidnapping
    • Article 133 Conduct Unbecoming
    • Article 134 Bribery and Graft
    • Article 134 Indecent Language
    • Article 134 Obstruction of Justice
  • Firm History
    • Films
    • Books
    • Sketches
    • My Lai
    • Abu Ghraib
    • Haditha
    • MARSOC
    • The Stryker 5
    • Gary Myers
  • Results
  • Blog

Chapter 4: Article 79, UCMJ Lesser Included Offenses

§ 4:1
Text of Statute

§ 4:2
Discussion

§ 4:3
Article 134 Offenses

§ 4:4
Practice Pointers

§ 4:5
Standard Instructions

§ 4:1 – Text of Statute
“An accused may be found guilty of an offense necessarily included in the offense charged or of an attempt to commit either the offense charge or an offense necessarily included therein.”
 
§ 4:2  – Discussion
Debate over the appropriate test for when an offense is necessarily included within the elements of a charged offense has been lengthy and confusing.  Military courts have engaged in decades of debate over the meaning of that term.  This book is only intended to be a practice guide.

The present rule to determine whether an offense is “necessarily included” in a charged offense is the elements test.  In other words, if all of the elements of the proposed lesser included offense are also elements of the charged offense, then the panel can be properly instructed on the lesser included offense. [1] The listings of lesser included offenses contained in the Manual for Courts-Martial are not binding on the courts.  Though they are a useful guide, counsel should rely on the elements defined by Congress. 

§ 4:3 – Article 134 Offenses
Simply stated, Article 134 offenses are not lesser included offenses under Articles 82 through 132.  Article 134 offenses have terminal elements – a requirement that they be prejudicial to good order and discipline or service discrediting.  Because of the terminal element, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has held that Article 134 offenses would fail the elements test when applied to Articles 82 through 132.[2]  For example, involuntary manslaughter is found under Article 119.  Negligent homicide is an Article 134 offense.  Under the elements test, negligent homicide is not a lesser included offense to involuntary manslaughter.[3]

§ 4:4 – Practice Pointers
The law in the military gives the military judge expansive discretion instructing the jury.  If some evidence is admitted at trial that reasonably raises a lesser included offense, than the military judge has a sua sponte duty to instruct the jury on that offense.[4]  Failure to object, however, constitutes waiver, absent plain error.[5]

The issue of lesser included offenses becomes agonizing in high stakes cases – like premeditated murder.  The question as to whether the evidence raises the lesser included offense of manslaughter can be difficult.   Sometimes, the military judge will defer to defense counsel’s view in ruling on a lesser included offense.  The judge, however, is under no obligation to take the defense view, nor is the government required to defer to the defense.[6]

On the one hand, in a murder case defense counsel may believe that there is no evidence of premeditation and that the panel will acquit.  On the other hand, defense counsel may believe that if the panel is given the option of convicting on a lesser included offense, they will spare the client the conviction to premeditated murder.  

The problem arises when defense counsel fails to object to a judge’s sua sponte instruction on a lesser included offense.  It’s a high stakes gamble in a premeditated murder case where there is a minimum mandatory sentence of life.  This is an area where defense counsel must, well in advance, consider possible lesser included offenses and discuss them with the client. 

The standard benchbook instructions provides a helpful guide.  Counsel should also careful scrutinize the judge’s proposed instructions, because they can become confusing when there are multiple possible lesser included offenses.  The benchbook recommend the following order:

  1. Instructions and definitions of the charged offense.
  2. Introduction of the lesser included offense.
  3. Elements and definitions of the lesser included offense.
  4. Comparison between the offense charged and the lesser included offense.
  5. If more than one lesser included offense is raised by the evidence, follow the instructions pattern above for each lesser included offense.
    ​
§ 4:5 – Standard Instructions
Standard Instructions
DA Pamphlet 27-9
3-3-1 – Conviction of Lesser Included Offenses
7-15 - Variance
7-16 – Exceptions and Substitutions


[1] United States v. Jones, 68 MJ 465 (CAAF 2010).

[2] United States v. Jones, 69 MJ 465 (CAAF 2010)

[3] United States v. McMurrin, 69 MJ 591 (NM Ct Crim App 2010).

[4] United States v. Miergrimado, 66 MJ 34 (CAAF 2008). 

[5] RCM 920 (f).

[6] United States v. Swemly, No. 200900359 (NM Ct Crim App Apr 29 2010)(unpub)

Court Martial Defense
Sexual Crime Defense
Drug Crimes
Violent Crimes
Larceny & Financial Fraud
Desertion & Awol


Services
Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP)
UCMJ Investigations
GOMOR Rebuttals
Administrative Separations
Resources
Case Results
Videos
Testimonials
Blogs
Locations
United States
South Korea
Okinawa, Japan
Mainland Japan
Europe
Worldwide
CALL 833-934-UCMJ
Email
Resources
Free Initial Consultations
Confidential. In depth. Valuable.

833-934-8265 (UCMJ)
Picture
© COPYRIGHT 2019. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 
The information on this page is informational in nature. Nothing on this or associated pages should be construed as legal advice for a particular case. Likewise, the information on this website does not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
  • Practice Areas
    • Correcting Military Records >
      • Evaluation Report Appeals
      • Reprimand Appeals
      • Family Advocacy Program Appeals
      • Discharge Review Boards
      • Cadet Misconduct
      • Titling Actions
      • Military Protective Orders
    • Separation Boards
    • Military Medical Malpractice Claims
    • Forms, Downloads, and Regulations
  • Military Crimes and Defenses
    • Military Law >
      • Court-martial Information >
        • Know Your Rights
        • Court-Martial Rules >
          • Pretrial Confinement
          • Unlawful Command Influence
          • Article 31 Violation
          • Military Rule of Evidence 412
          • Involuntary Statements
          • Failure to State an Offense
          • Wheeler Factors
      • Court-Martial Defense >
        • Military Sexual Assault Defense
        • Military Drug Defense >
          • Drug Detection Windows
          • Marijuana
          • Cocaine
          • Morphine and Heroin
        • Disrespect Offenses
        • Conspiracy Cases
        • False Statements >
          • Obstruction of Justice
        • Use of Force
        • Assault Cases
        • Conduct Unbecoming
      • Court-Martial Appeals >
        • Petitions for a New Trial
        • Insufficient Evidence
    • Introduction
    • Article 77 Principles
    • Article 78 Accessory After the Fact
    • Article 79 Lesser Included Offenses
    • Article 80 Conspiracy
    • Article 81 Attempts
    • Article 82 Solicitation
    • Article 85 Desertion
    • Article 86 AWOL
    • Article 88 Contempt Towards Officials
    • Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order
    • Article 93 Maltreatment
    • Article 107 False Official Statement
    • Article 112a Wrongful Use of a Controlled Substance
    • Article 119 Manslaughter
    • Article 119b Child Endangerment
    • Article 121 Larceny or Wrongful Appropriation
    • Article 125 Kidnapping
    • Article 133 Conduct Unbecoming
    • Article 134 Bribery and Graft
    • Article 134 Indecent Language
    • Article 134 Obstruction of Justice
  • Firm History
    • Films
    • Books
    • Sketches
    • My Lai
    • Abu Ghraib
    • Haditha
    • MARSOC
    • The Stryker 5
    • Gary Myers
  • Results
  • Blog